Recording War Damage (DFG)
Content and objectives
Most cities affected by the Second World War kept records of war damage and produced damage maps. These little-studied documents are valuable historical sources because they contain information about urban history, heritage conservation and cultural geography. On the basis of war damage maps, municipalities decided the future of rubble sites and ruins. At the same time, local actors reappraised their built cultural heritage and drew up new inventories of historically significant buildings.
The project “War Damage Recording in the Second World War as a Heritage-Making Moment” (DFG) gathers together the archival records in which war damage is listed and evaluated, with a specific focus on eight cities in Central Europe. The project is comparative in nature and international in scope, and is being conducted in close cooperation with the Department of Heritage Conservation at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. The aim is a systematic collection of damage maps in digital form, which will be indexed and made accessible for academic research. The platform wardamageatlas.com will publish these data.
The municipal archives in the cities unter study contain maps and lists that record war damage or building assessments, but these are often held in separate archival collections. These documents are to be systematically researched and linked, which will aid in recovering missing map legends and thus make it possible to read the entire content of each map. In addition to local map inventories, there is also a total inventory of damage maps for cities within the sphere of influence of the German Reich: during the war, the “German Taskforce for the Reconstruction of Bomb Damaged Cities” collected damage maps from the Reich Minister for Armaments and War Production. This inventory is used as a reference collection (private collection of Niels Gutschow: Carleton University Archives and Staatsarchiv Hamburg).
Soon after the project began, it became clear that the damage maps prepared for German cities were more varied than was previously realized. Their functions ranged from the preparation of compensation payments to use as a planning basis for urban development, and from the presentation of monument values to the organisation of rubble clearance in individual properties. Frequently, the maps contained 3D information that indicated the number of intact floors in a damaged building. When published, such maps were often simplified, thus they contained radically reduced information.
Utilization of findings
The study of damage maps makes it possible to read the rebuilding process less as a simple reaction to destruction, and more as the result of deliberate and calculated decision-making on the part of the wartime and post-war generations. It allows for a more nuanced view of the post-war city and provides a basis -- lacking thus far -- for a critical analysis and appreciation of this rebuilding era.
A comparative typology of existing damage maps promises to provide those dealing with present-day catastrophic events with a model for the production of value and damage maps, and for the decision-making processes that rely on them.