Universität Bamberg - Logo

Aktuelles

Sprechstunden im Wintersemester 2014/15


Ausführlich

Summer School in Bamberg, 30. June 2014 - 11. July 2014: Documentary Linguistics and Variationist Sociolinguistics


Ausführlich

Das "Endangered Languages Documentation Programme" bewilligt Förderung des Sprachdokumentationsprojektes "Chirag Documentation Project"


Ausführlich

Zusätzliches englischsprachiges Lehrangebot im Sommersemester 2014


Ausführlich

Masterstudiengang "General Linguistics" studierbar ab Wintersemester 2013/2014!


Ausführlich

Alle News

Publications

  • Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova. In Press. Insubordination in the Tsezic languages. In Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.) The dynamics of insubordination. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Forker, Diana. Evidentiality in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Press. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Forker, Diana. Ergativity in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Press. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, & Lisa Travis (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Forker, Diana. Grammatical relations in Sanzhi Dargwa. In Press. In Balthasar Bickel & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.) Handbook of grammatical relations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova. In Press. Affective constructions in Tsezic languages. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Stephen Mark Carey, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Na'ama Pat-El (eds.), Non-canonically case-marked subjects within and across languages and language families: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Forker, Diana & Oleg Belyaev. In Press. Information structure in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In M.M.Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin Jr (eds.), Information structure and spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Forker, Diana. Complementizers in Hinuq. In Press. In Kasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.) Semantic functions of complementizers in European languages. Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • __________________________________________________________
  • Forker, Diana. 2014c. Are there subject anaphors? Linguistic Typology 18: 51–81.
  • Forker, Diana. 2014b. A canonical approach to the argument/adjunct distinction. Linguistic Discovery 12: 27–40.
  • Forker, Diana. 2014a. The grammar of knowledge in Hinuq. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.). The grammar of knowledge, 52-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • __________________________________________________________
  • Forker, Diana. 2013e. Interrogative particles in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 4.
  • Forker, Diana. 2013d. Microtypology and the Tsezic languages: A case study of syntactic properties of converbal clauses. SKY Journal of Linguistics 26: 21-40.
  • Forker, Diana. 2013c. Hinuq verb forms and finiteness. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 66, 6993.
  • Forker, Diana. 2013b. Differential agent marking in Hinuq. In Elly van Gelderen, Michaela Cennamo & Johanna Barðdal (eds.) Variation and change in argument realization: The Naples Capri papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33–52. 
  • Forker, Diana. 2013a. A Grammar of Hinuq.* Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • __________________________________________________________
  • Forker, Diana. 2012d. Experiencer constructions in Hinuq. In B. Belikov, M. Daniel, E. Ljutikova, T. Majsak, S. Tatevosov & O. Fedorova (eds.) Aleksandr Egvenevič Kibrik. In Memoriam. Moscow: MSU, 143–145.
  • Forker, Diana. 2012c. Spatial relations in Hinuq and Bezhta. In Luna Filipović & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.) Space and time across languages, disciplines, and cultures. Volume I. Linguistic diversity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 15–34.
  • Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova. 2012b. Adverbial clauses in the Tsezic languages. In Holger Diessel & Volker Gast (eds.) Clause combining in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter, 157–190.
  • Forker, Diana. 2012a. The Bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46, 75–108.
  • __________________________________________________________
  • Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova. 2011d. Alignment typology, reflexives, and reciprocals in Tsezic languages. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 37, 3251.
  • Forker, Diana. 2011c. Evidentiality and new media in the Caucasus - The case of Hinuq. In Peter Austin, Oliver Bond, David Nathan & Lutz Marten (eds.) Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3. London: SOAS, 101–110.
  •  Forker, Diana. 2011b. Grammatical relations in Hinuq. In Vittorio Tomelleri, Manana. Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds.) Languages and cultures in the Caucasus. Papers from the international conference "Current advances in Caucasian studies", Macerata, January 21-23, 2010. Munich/Berlin: Otto Sagner, 553–567.
  • Forker, Diana. 2011a. Finiteness in Hinuq. Linguistic Discovery 9, 3–29.
  • ________________________________________________________
  • Forker, Diana. 2010b. Non-Local Uses of Local Cases in the Tsezic Languages. Linguistics 48(5), 1083-1109.
  • Forker, Diana. 2010a. Variation in Stem Formation in Tsezic Languages. Suvremena Lingvistika 69(1), 1-19.
  • ________________________________________________________
  • Forker, Diana. 2009b. Information Structure and Reference-Tracking in Hinuq. Caucasiologic Papers, 181-186.
  • Cysouw, Michael & Diana Forker. 2009a. Reconstruction of Morphosyntactic Function: Nonspatial Usage of Spatial Case Marking in Tsezic. Language 85(3), 588-617.

* monograph